Introductive: This is the article of a reprinted interpreter, textual author feels quite extreme, the main viewpoint of the article also lacks strong evidence, but circulate as a result of this article wider, accordingly my general discusses the wrong point of view of this article alone.

About the security of Cookie, any websites can release Cookie, is Google not just, include Baidu and Yahoo to be in use Cookie, we can not receive Cookie completely also in browser setting, although was received, also can browbeat without apparent evidential proof Cookie the safety of this locality system.

Collect an individual to search information question about Google, these information perhaps attribute private matters one wants to hide, but we believe Google will be responsible to the user, a typical case about privacy of search data individual is, commit a crime to hit pornography of the children on the net, american judiciary once asked to search engine to offer a part to search content individually, microsoft and Yahoo cooperated judiciary, have government of Google antagonism United States only, to protect the privacy of the user, refus does not offer a search to request list, be accused by American government thereby court. However, of the court adjudging a result is helpful for Google however, this behavior of Google won American government not just, still won the respect of the user. Accordingly, if the competitor of Google atttacks Google according to this, that is honest too impertinent.

Since happening in incident of American eavesdrop door, and latter country is right of network monitoring strengthen, let me must admire the effort that the principle place that Google company stands fast to it makes. Google has his law, won’t tilt at will and compromise, this is major company for example Microsoft, Yahoo cannot accomplish, as to home those result from purely commercial interest and the Baidu that drive develops, 3721 coming compared with Google etc is antic and general simply, not worth to be carried.

Yes, country cannot go Google forever such company, baidu and the 3721 browsers that are fond of development rogue software to rape an user, be fond of the user search information change is advertisement of search contest price. In their eye never evil this concept, to make money their what thing does come out. Protect the netizen’s interest? Baidu people rape netizen still disrelishs speed slow.

It is translation below:

The fact that the nine of Google makes the person is confused

Apparent, google is in ceaselessly collect the information of everybody, reject to tell us why to work so however. This is early to us what be new issue. In Google page of incontrollable search result is what appearance when, who can they control however reading what content.

Google Are Clearly Gathering Information About Us But Refuse To Tell Us Why. It’s Nothing New To Us, but While They Cannot Control Normal SERPs, they Do However Control Who Is Viewing What And When.

We run Google ad on the page is to live. But do this mean us to should not share the information below and you? If you know other method can give us website support, contact with me please.

We Run Google Adverts In Order To Survive. Does This Mean We Shouldn’t Share The Information Below? If You Know An Alternative Way To Sustain Costs Please Get In Touch.

If you look carefully at the webpage that includes Google Adsense, google can track your privacy. But ask an attention, the measure that Google trails your privacy is more than hereat.

Please Note, google Does Not Track You By Simply Viewing Pages Containing Their Adverts.

1, amaranthine Cookie:

1. Google’s Immortal Cookie:

In each search engine, google uses the Cookie that just expired 2038 the first times. The website is returned at that time by the Cookie with permanent and effective taboo. Now, each search engine serves a provider to use permanent and effective Cookie. Because do not have a person to disagree to this, because the behavior of this Google is whole industry set standard. The Cookie of Google sets an exclusive label number on your hard disk. Without giving thought to when, want you to open the webpage of Google only, if there is the Cookie of Google on your hard disk, google can put to you. If you had, google can read the label number that takes you to make a record.

Google Was The First Search Engine To Use A Cookie That Expires In 2038. This Was At A Time When Federal Websites Were Prohibited From Using Persistent Cookies Altogether. Now It’s Years Later, and Immortal Cookies Are Commonplace Among Search Engines; Google Set The Standard Because No One Bothered To Challenge Them. This Cookie Places A Unique ID Number On Your Hard Disk. Anytime You Land On A Google Page, you Get A Google Cookie If You Don’t Already Have One. If You Have One, they Read And Record Your Unique ID Number.

2, Google records all things that they can record

2. Google Records Everything They Can:

You every do a search, google is counted with respect to the label that can record Cookie and deliver the IP address of the search, time date, search keyword and browser configuration. Google provides the search result that is based on your IP address to optimize more and more possibly, allocate because of IP address and physical position is relative.

For All Searches They Record The Cookie ID, your Internet IP Address, the Time And Date, your Search Terms, and Your Browser Configuration. Increasingly, google Is Customizing Results Based On Your IP Number. This Is Referred To In The Industry As “IP Delivery Based On Geolocation. This Is Referred To In The Industry As “IP Delivery Based On Geolocation..

3, Google is permanent the data that saves them to record

3. Google Retains All Data Indefinitely:

Google interior is withheld without data how long regulation. Evidence makes clear Google can very conveniently collect of bring into contact with and saved all user information.

Google Has No Data Retention Policies. There Is Evidence That They Are Able To Easily Access All The User Information They Collect And Save.

4, Google does not explain why they need these data

4. Google Won’t Say Why They Need This Data:

The inquiry that issues privacy policy to Google always cannot get a response. When new York Times one of author of inquiry Sergey Brin(Google are mixed president) Google gets because of privacy policy information when judicial summon to court, he does not grant buy is judged (2002-11-28) .

Inquiries To Google About Their Privacy Policies Are Ignored. When The New York Times Asked Sergey Brin About Whether Google Ever Gets Subpoenaed For This Information, he Had No Comment.

5, Google employ is emissary

5. Google Hires Spooks:

Matt Cutts, a principal engineer, once worked for National Security Agency(1, 2) . Google hopes can the data that more people come employ arrive to collect undertakes investigating, such they can the spy that Xiang Huacheng pauses people the organization peddles valuable information.

Matt Cutts, a Key Google Engineer, used To Work For The. Google Wants To Hire More People With Security Clearances, so That They Can Peddle Their Corporate Assets To The Spooks In Washington.

6, Google tool column is emissary software

6. Google’s Toolbar Is Spyware:

If you allow to use advanced option, so each webpage that you see can be recorded by tool column and convey Google server. The privacy strategy that installs tool column moment had admitted this, because be sued possibly,nevertheless that is merely. The tool handrail of Alexa same thing was not however in privacy strategy statement, thereby play away one picket lawsuit. More of flooey is, google tool column won’t ask your opinion before upgrade, it always is soundless finished upgrade. This is meant, once you installed Google tool column, you receive every time repeatedly Google webpage (have a lot of times in a day) , google has complete visit limits of authority to your hard disk. Most software vendor, even Microsoft can enquire whether you need to upgrade. Google is not such. Any software that upgrade automatically mean a large number of potential safe hidden trouble.

With The Advanced Features Enabled, google’s Free Toolbar For Explorer Phones Home With Every Page You Surf, and Yes, it Reads Your Cookie Too. Their Privacy Policy Confesses This, but That’s Only Because Alexa Lost A Class-action Lawsuit When Their Toolbar Did The Same Thing, and Their Privacy Policy Failed To Explain This. Worse Yet, google’s Toolbar Updates To New Versions Quietly, and Without Asking. This Means That If You Have The Toolbar Installed, google Essentially Has Complete Access To Your Hard Disk Every Time You Connect To Google (which Is Many Times A Day) . Most Software Vendors, and Even Microsoft, ask If You’d Like An Updated Version. But Not Google. Any Software That Updates Automatically Presents A Massive Security Risk.

(Translator is pressed: GWhere is Oogle Desktop? Where is Oogle Desktop??

7, of the law of webpage snapshot dispute of Google

7. Google’s Cache Copy Is Illegal:

Use American copyright method at the legal precedent judgement of Internet according to court of the 9th circuit, the webpage snapshot of Google appears illegimate. Avoid a website exclusively to be saved by Google the method of snapshot adds Noarchive inside each page namely yuan mark. The person that browse likes webpage snapshot, but website administrator people do not like. Stationmaster of a lot of websites had deleted the content that there is a problem on the website, discover these content still survive however at webpage snapshot. Webpage snapshot should be to be able to choose to join or be not joined, is not now such, can choose to exit only or do not exit.

Judging From Ninth Circuit Precedent On The Application Of U.S. Copyright Laws To The Internet, google’s Cache Copy Appears To Be Illegal. The Only Way A Webmaster Can Avoid Having His Site Cached On Google Is To Put A “noarchive” Meta In The Header Of Every Page On His Site. Surfers Like The Cache, but Webmasters Don’t. Many Webmasters Have Deleted Questionable Material From Their Sites, only To Discover Later That The Problem Pages Live Merrily On In Google’s Cache. The Cache Copy Should Be “opt-in” For Webmasters, not “opt-out. Not “opt-out..

8, the friend that Google is not you

8. Google Is Not Your Friend:

So far, visit of great majority website measures 75% come from at Google. If website stationmaster wants to increase flow, they must ask Google is the same as different idea first. If stationmaster people want to use Google to keep secret the certain flaw in semi-overt algorithm will get benefit partly, they can be punished very quickly by Google, discharge was done not have completely. Google did not release what make public in detail to punish flow. To the website that is punished, also seek the way that is less than any appeal. The behaviour of Google cannot predict at all. Google of great much time does not reply even the correspondence of website stationmaster.

By Now Google Enjoys A 75 Percent Monopoly For All External Referrals To Most Websites. Webmasters Cannot Avoid Seeking Google’s Approval These Days, assuming They Want To Increase Traffic To Their Site. If They Try To Take Advantage Of Some Of The Known Weaknesses In Google’s Semi-secret Algorithms, they May Find Themselves Penalized By Google, and Their Traffic Disappears. There Are No Detailed, published Standards Issued By Google, and There Is No Appeal Process For Penalized Sites. Google Is Completely Unaccountable. Most Of The Time Google Doesn’t Even Answer Email From Webmasters.

9, Google is privacy time bomb

9. Google Is A Privacy Time Bomb:

The search that Google assumes 200 million times everyday, among them great majority comes from beyond the United States. This shows, google had been accumulated sufficient the data that can cause disaster of a privacy. Washington those are new what the responsible data that assume office digs is bureaucratic daydream what think is efficient early was realized by Google.

With 200 Million Searches Per Day, most From Outside The U.S. , google Amounts To A Privacy Disaster Waiting To Happen. Those Newly-commissioned Data-mining Bureaucrats In Washington Can Only Dream About The Sort Of Slick Efficiency That Google Has Already Achieved.

Textual: Disturbing Facts About Google, translation comes from CnBeta.